A living index of organisations using governance influence to solve hard, shared problems affecting billions.
The Soft Power Index is a public leaderboard that ranks organisations by their demonstrated ability to use governance influence — not financial leverage or political authority — to change how other institutions behave. It tracks organisations that are solving problems markets won't touch and states can't solve alone, because those problems require commitments that cross borders, decades, and political cycles.
The index was created by Sophie Krantz. It is openly maintained: events, actors, and scoring disputes are submitted by contributors worldwide and curated editorially. Scores are judgment calls, updated weekly as events unfold.
Organisational soft power: the ability of an institution to change how other organisations and governments behave through governance choices that others voluntarily adopt. Not reputation. Not stated mission. Demonstrated influence on external behaviour — whether others have changed what they do because of how this organisation chose to govern itself.
Each organisation is scored on three dimensions, each rated 0–10:
Demonstrated governance influence and norm-setting. Has this organisation made governance decisions that others adopted voluntarily? Has it exercised restraint or refusal at meaningful cost?
Specificity and scale of the problem being addressed. Is the problem clearly named, measurable, and one that markets or states alone cannot solve?
Financial, operational, and institutional resources to sustain the commitment over time.
Index Score = (SP × 0.45) + (HPF × 0.35) + (CAP × 0.20)
Before being scored, every organisation must pass five qualitative filters:
The Soft Power Index is curated by Sophie Krantz. It was sparked by Anthropic's decision in early 2025 to refuse a Pentagon request to relax AI safety guardrails — a moment that raised a larger question: which institutions are willing to spend their soft power on hard problems rather than narrow interests?
As of March 2026, the following 22 organisations are profiled and scored. Scores are on a 0–10 scale. The Index Score is calculated as (SP × 0.45) + (HPF × 0.35) + (CAP × 0.20).
| # | Organisation | Sector | SP | HPF | CAP | Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRAC | Civil Society | 8.8 | 9.5 | 8.2 | 8.93 |
| 2 | Wellcome Trust | Philanthropy / Health | 7.9 | 9 | 8.6 | 8.43 |
| 3 | CEPI | Multilateral / Intergovernmental | 7.8 | 9.4 | 7.6 | 8.32 |
| 4 | Aravind Eye Care System | Healthcare | 8.2 | 8.8 | 7.2 | 8.21 |
| 5 | Ørsted | Energy | 7.8 | 8.6 | 8.3 | 8.18 |
| 6 | Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance | Multilateral / Health | 7.1 | 9.2 | 8.8 | 8.17 |
| 7 | Anthropic | AI / Technology | 8.4 | 8.1 | 7.2 | 8.06 |
| 8 | Novo Nordisk Foundation | Scientific Consortium / Corporate Foundation | 7.2 | 8.4 | 9.3 | 8.04 |
| 9 | SESAME | Intergovernmental / Science Diplomacy | 8.3 | 8.1 | 7 | 7.97 |
| 10 | Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad | Worker Cooperative / FMCG | 7.9 | 8.3 | 7.1 | 7.88 |
| 11 | SEWA | Civil Society / Labour | 8.4 | 8.1 | 6.2 | 7.86 |
| 12 | Merck & Co. | Pharmaceuticals | 6.6 | 9.1 | 8.4 | 7.83 |
| 13 | Coalition for Rainforest Nations | Multilateral / Climate Governance | 7.8 | 8.6 | 6.2 | 7.76 |
| 14 | ASML | Technology / Semiconductors | 7.6 | 6.8 | 9.2 | 7.64 |
| 15 | Patagonia | Corporate / Mission-locked | 8.6 | 7.2 | 5.8 | 7.55 |
| 16 | Chan Zuckerberg Initiative | Philanthropy / Science & Technology | 6.5 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 7.48 |
| 17 | Open Society Foundations | Philanthropy / Civil Society | 7.6 | 6.8 | 7.4 | 7.28 |
| 18 | Microsoft | Technology | 6.8 | 6.4 | 9.6 | 7.22 |
| 19 | Temasek | Sovereign / State-backed Fund | 6.4 | 6.9 | 9.4 | 7.18 |
| 20 | DeepMind (Google) | AI / Technology | 6.2 | 7.4 | 8.9 | 7.16 |
| 21 | IKEA Foundation | Corporate Foundation | 6.8 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 7.14 |
| 22 | WHO | Multilateral / Intergovernmental | 5.4 | 8.8 | 6.8 | 6.87 |
All 22 organisations are ranked by composite Index Score. Scores reflect editorial judgment as of the most recent weekly update.
The live leaderboard is available at softpowerindex.lovable.app. Full methodology is published on Substack. A self-scoring diagnostic tool is available at /diagnostic.